Monday, September 28, 2020
More

    Hany Babu, Safoora Zagar and Our Times

    Is it possible to overcome all sorts of sectarianism, come together as dialogic teachers, and remind the state of the need for a dialogue with the creative dissenters?

    To transform the world, to recreate it afresh, men must turn into another path psychologically. Until you have become really, in actual fact, a brother to everyone, brotherhood will not come to pass.

    – Fyodor Dostoyevsky, The Karamazov Brothers

    I have never met Professor Hany Babu; and till now I have not got an opportunity to interact with Safoora Zagar. Yet, the skill of empathy that I have evolved as a teacher—yes, simply a teacher without the ideological baggage of ‘left’ vs. ‘right’—makes it easier for me communicate with them in silence. Yes, Professor Hany Babu is a known name; the students and teachers of Delhi University adore him, speak of his scholarship, his significant work in the field of literature and linguistics, and his commitment to the ideals of social justice and human rights. I can imagine his intensity and passion; I can see him inspiring his students in the vibrant classroom. Even if I disagree with him—say, on politico-ideological issues, I can still learn from him; and I know that it would not be difficult for me to spend an hour with him at the DU cafeteria, and have a cup of coffee together. Likewise, I have heard a great deal about Safoora Zagar; some of my students who teach at Jamia Millia Islamia have told me about her courage and conviction, and her honesty and sincerity. Had I been at Jamia, I would have loved to initiate a conversation with this vibrant/young student; and possibly, we would have reflected on culture, politics, philosophy, sociology, gender and religion. And I am sure that despite differences, we would have evolved and grown.

    Yes, the life of a student-teacher is precisely this: debating and evolving, learning and unlearning, and negotiating and acquiring the courage to live with the plurality of perspectives. But then, I am aware of the fact that a teacher’s heart is not necessarily what the state or its legal/bureaucratic machinery appreciates. For me, Professor Hany Babu is a colleague, or a passionate being driven by the ideals of justice and equity; however, for the state, he is a conspirator: a threat to the nation. For me, Safoora is a promising student with curious eyes and heightened spirit of humanism; but then, for the state, she too is a conspirator trying to disrupt social harmony and peace.

    And I ask myself: why is it that a teacher’s heart has no meaning when the state deals with the likes of Professor Hany Babu or Safoora Zagar?

    A teacher’s heart vs. the state’s logic of surveillance

     Where words come out from the depth of truth,

    where tireless striving stretches its arms towards perfection. 

    Where the clear stream of reason

    has not lost its way

    into the dreary desert sand of dead habit.

        Rabindranath Tagore

    Well, when I joined the vocation of teaching and research, I realized that it ought to be celebrated as a domain of possibilities—diverse and even conflicting ways of looking at the world, politics, culture and society. It is this non-deterministic space that allows what can be regarded as epistemological pluralism; it allows multiple perspectives to develop; dissent is not seen as an act of criminality; instead, it cultivates critical thinking, and promotes the culture of debate and dialogue. In other words, a university need not necessarily be obliged to say ‘yes’ to the system, or its ruling ideology; it can even question the cherished ideals or practices of nation, nationalism, religion and secularism. And hence, I thought that as a university professor, I should be ready to live with many voices—including the voices that my politico-cultural sensibilities need not necessarily approve of. I am not a bureaucrat—an agent of the ‘law and order’ machinery. I am simply a wanderer—debating, questioning, learning and unlearning. Hence, it became easier for me to evolve a teacher’s heart. I debated. I disagreed. But I never castigated someone as a criminal with ‘anti-national’ traits.

    I live amid Marxists and Maoists, Gandhians and Ambedkarites, liberals and anarchists, believers and atheists, technocrats and poets, professional scientists and spiritually enriched philosophers. And the art of living with philosophical differences—not the dull bureaucratic uniformity— has become the rhythm of life. For instance, I have seen some of my students questioning my ‘forward caste’ location, and contesting my engagement with Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi; I have seen my Marxist friends interrogating my romance with Rabindranath Tagore and Jiddu Krishnamurti. And I too have not always given my consent to the process of ideological indoctrination a group of left-Ambedkarites engage with; I have not necessarily agreed with every word the likes of Judith Butler or even Ramasamy Periyar have uttered. But then, these differences, I have felt, are normal and natural. One’s academic integrity should not be doubted; nor should one’s character be scandalized for one’s politico-intellectual position. For instance, I would not like to be castigated or ridiculed by my philosophic opponents as a svarna Gandhian, or a bourgeois idealist; I would like to be listened to and understood. Or, even though I am not an ‘activist’ or a ‘left-Ambedkarite’, I can still raise my voice against the onslaught on public universities because, as I believe, no party has the absolute monopoly over emancipatory ideas. The fact that I am a dialogic teacher is enough; my existence should not depend on a certificate from the ‘leftist’ or the ‘rightist’ camp. Likewise, I do not think that my ‘Maoist’ colleague is a conspirator; nor do I feel that those who question the controversial NRC or CAB are betraying the nation. They are only imagining and striving for yet another idea of India. They need not produce the certificates of ‘patriotism’ sanctified by a particular school of thought.

    I know that this art of listening, or the ability to live gracefully amid differences is an exceedingly difficult task. But then, this is something that a university ought to teach us. We are not ‘loyal soldiers’ of the nation; nor are we spokespersons of political parties: Congress or BJP; BSP or CPM. Neither conformists nor conspirators—we are dialogic beings engaged in a rigorous process of continual self-reflection. Hence, beyond the prism of ‘’left’ vs. ‘right’, or ‘patriotic’ vs. ‘anti-national’, or ‘Ambedkarite’ vs. ‘Manuvadi’, I see Professor Hari Babu as a teacher, a thinker, a public intellectual, or a compassionate human being deeply concerned with the fate of Professor Saibaba—yet another dissenter somehow surviving in the dark cell of a prison. I do not see him through the eyes of a bureaucrat or a police official. As a teacher, I feel he is a thinking, sincere and reflexive being; and he should be listened to, even if his ideas disturb the status quo.. Likewise, Safoora Zagar, to me, is just like my student: a passionate student with a dream, a passion for the idea of a pluralist nation. And even if she is ‘angry’, a sane society must try to understand the reasons for her anguish. Her place is not the prison. She should be allowed to move freely, and bloom like a flower.

    Well, I do realize that the state or the ruling regime does not look at the world the way I do as a teacher. Why is it so? Possibly, there are two reasons for this. First, the intoxication with power goes against the spirit of a dialogue or a conversation. While dialogue requires mindful listening, the discourse of power acts as a barrier. It fears; it suspects; it stigmatizes. It wants conformity; it is uneasy with even the slightest difference. And if majoritarianism becomes the order of things and nationalism is equated with herd mentality, the dialogic space gets increasingly reduced; dissent is criminalized; and even a thinker is seen as a terrorist. Second, as power makes one insecure (the resultant fear of losing it), surveillance becomes the usual practice. And the psychology that nurtures surveillance becomes toxic. For instance, while a sufi mystic with the lightness of being might see a Kashmiri youth as a child of the divine, the police official—with his suspicious eyes—is likely to see him as a potential suicide bomber. As history shows, for the mighty British Empire, Gandhi’s ahimsa was a threat; for the fascist regime in Italy, Antonio Gramsci was a conspirator; and for the racists in South Africa, Nelson Mandela was an enemy. In fact, every totalitarian regime (‘left’ or ‘right’) fears the power of alternative visions and ideas. And hence, it censors ideas, condemns ‘radical’ books, and equates critical thinking with an act of criminality. For instance, it may even suspect you if you read Tagore’s essays on nationalism, or cherish the idea of Gandhi’s civil disobedience; it may employ the surveillance machinery to observe the minute details of your everyday life if you, for instance, refer to Mao and Che in your lecture on Marxism. As a result, it fails to distinguish a thinker from a criminal; a politically charged professor from a terrorist; or a creative dissenter from a murderer. The result is the absence of compassion. It is, therefore, not surprising that even at the time of the pandemic, a poet like Varavara Rao or an academic like Anand Teltumbe has to be sent to the prison.

    With the death of dialogue and compassion, we move towards darkness. Is it the time that as teachers, irrespective of our worldviews, we come forward, and urge the state to rethink its conduct?

    Avijit Pathak is Professor of Sociology at JNU.

     

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here

    The Latest

    India’s Job Crisis Spirals Beyond Control as Pandemic Takes Toll, Leaves People Defenceless

    The pandemic induced lockdown has worsened the job crisis in India posing a multitude of challenges before the nation-state.
    - Advertisement -

    The Idea of Early Childhood Care and Education as Enshrined in NEP 2020

    The following article focuses on Early Childhood Care and Education as discussed in NEP 2020.

    Examining the Implications of the FYUP on Indian Higher Education : A Reflection on the NEP 2020

    The author examines the implications of FYUP on higher education and reflects on the NEP 2020 in this context.

    TIME’s list of 100 most influential people in 2020 includes Indigenous Waorani leader

    Nemonte Nenquimo, a leader of Ecuador’s Indigenous Waorani nation, has been named one of Time magazine’s 100 most influential people of 2020 for her work in defending her people’s territory in the Amazon Rainforest against the extractive industry.

    Ruth Bader Ginsburg forged a new place for women in the law and society

    Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death has generated an outpouring of grief around the globe. Part of this grief reflects her unparalleled status as a...

    The Unnoticed Pain and Disappointment of India’s Poor

    The pandemic saw the poor becoming poorer and the issues of unemployment, poverty and financial distress magnifying. With state neglect and sustained apathy, what about India’s poor?

    Related Stories

    CM Arvind Kejriwal Assures Second Wave Has Already Reached its Peak in the Capital, Cases Likely to Decline Soon

    Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal says that the second wave of the pandemic has already hit a peak in Delhi and the cases are to decline in the coming days.

    Delhi to Protest Against Forceful Eviction of Residents of 48,000 Slums Amid Pandemic

    Many organisations have come together to launch a series of protests against the order to forcefully evict over 48,000 slums along railway tracks in the Capital.

    Delhi Riot Cases-The Police Should Not Ignore the Sage Advice of its Own Elders

    The handling of Delhi riot cases  has attracted a lot of adverse comments recently and there has been a special concern that innocent persons,...

    A Pornographic Culture, Societal Violence and the Implications of Our Collective Decadence

    Consumption of aggressive pornographic content promotes violence, exploitation and heightened oppression of women, while corrupting the societal fabric.

    Political Will or Concerted Effort: The Delhi Model and the Fight Against COVID-19

    The Delhi Model is being talked about amid the coronavirus pandemic, the following article looks at the contemporary discussions around the government’s success model.

    Corporatisation of Agriculture Will Orphan the Indian Farmer in a Competitive Market, Not Expand His Choices

    Farmers have been agitating and protesting against the three Agricultural Bills recently passed in the Parliament. Here is a thorough look at the demands and concerns being raised.

    The Need to Look Beyond the Guru-Shishya Paradigm: The Need of Our Times

    While embedded in Indian cultural history, the Guru-Shishya parampara needs to be rethought and critically examined today not to condemn or praise but to delve deep into its roots.

    To Uphold Dignity and Safety of Healthcare Workers, Rajya Sabha Passes Epidemic Diseases Amendment Bill

    The Rajya Sabha has passed the Epidemic Diseased Amendment Bill to ensure that violence/offences against healthcare workers can be prevented and punished.

    Trump’s appeals to white anxiety are not ‘dog whistles’ – they’re racism

    Trump wouldn’t be the first politician to do dog whistle politics. My political psychology research has found that George W. Bush used religious dog whistles quite effectively.

    The Sudarshan TV Case and the Issue of Vilifying Muslims and Damaging the Credibility of UPSC

    The Sudarshan TV case has captured the national imagination and put a question mark on the propagation of hate through media, and has questioned the credibility of the UPSC.